Skip to content
Mandate SA — home
Ward

Ward 92

A ward of the delimitation used from 5 December 2000 to 1 March 2006, in Johannesburg - City of Johannesburg [Johannesburg]. It is not a 2021 ward and is not drawn on today’s map. Official results of the 2000 Local Government Elections below (the latest verified for this place), with their sources.

Boundaries of this earlier delimitation are not in the record.

Its results are below, by election.

Share of valid votes

  1. AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS80,0%
  2. DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE/DEMOKRATIESE ALLIANSIE15,5%
  3. INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY1,7%
  4. PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA1,4%
  5. AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY1,1%
  6. Others (1)0,3%

All contestants and the source

2000 Local Government Elections

Held · Official results — not current figures

Ward 92 ward ballot

AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS won the ward in 2000, with 4 898 votes (80,0% of valid votes).

This is the latest verified contest in this ward.

Registered voters
17 414
Votes cast
6 263
Turnout
36,0%
Spoilt ballots
138
How many votes did each contestant receive?
Party or contestantVotesShare
AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS4 89880,0%
DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE/DEMOKRATIESE ALLIANSIE95215,5%
INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY1021,7%
PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA861,4%
AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY681,1%
VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS190,3%

Elections in this ward

The general election of this ward's delimitation, newest first · IEC results

  1. 2000 Local Government ElectionsAFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS had the most votes, 80,0%.

Public money

Projects whose published coordinates lie in this ward; budgets, audits and tenders are published for the municipality as a whole

No project on the national register publishes a point in this ward. Provincial and municipal project registers are not on the record yet, so this is not a statement that no public project exists here.

Budgets, audit opinions and tenders: Johannesburg - City of Johannesburg [Johannesburg]’s public money. Nothing municipal is divided across wards or attributed to this ward without a source that says so.