Ward 89
A ward of the delimitation used from 3 August 2016 to 1 November 2021, in City of Johannesburg. It is not a 2021 ward and is not drawn on today’s map. Official results of the 2016 Local Government Elections below (the latest verified for this place), with their sources.
Boundaries of this earlier delimitation are not in the record.
Share of valid votes
- DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE87,1%
- AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS8,3%
- ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS2,3%
- VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS1,4%
- AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY0,3%
- Others (6)0,5%
2016 Local Government Elections
Held · Official results — not current figures
Ward 89 ward ballot
DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE won the ward in 2016, with 11 182 votes (87,1% of valid votes).
This is the latest verified contest in this ward.
- Registered voters
- 18 288
- Votes cast
- 12 903
- Turnout
- 70,6%
- Spoilt ballots
- 65
| Party or contestant | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE | 11 182 | 87,1% |
| AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 1 062 | 8,3% |
| ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS | 301 | 2,3% |
| VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS | 184 | 1,4% |
| AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY | 43 | 0,3% |
| AFRICAN INDEPENDENT CONGRESS | 33 | 0,3% |
| UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT | 13 | 0,1% |
| AL JAMA-AH | 9 | 0,1% |
| TRULY ALLIANCE | 7 | 0,1% |
| AZANIAN PEOPLE'S ORGANISATION | 3 | 0,0% |
| AFRICAN PEOPLE'S SOCIALIST PARTY | 1 | 0,0% |
Elections in this ward
The general election of this ward's delimitation, newest first · IEC results
- 2016 Local Government ElectionsDEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE had the most votes, 87,1%.
Public money
Projects whose published coordinates lie in this ward; budgets, audits and tenders are published for the municipality as a whole
No project on the national register publishes a point in this ward. Provincial and municipal project registers are not on the record yet, so this is not a statement that no public project exists here.
Budgets, audit opinions and tenders: City of Johannesburg’s public money. Nothing municipal is divided across wards or attributed to this ward without a source that says so.