Skip to content
Mandate SA — home
Ward

Ward 104

A ward of the delimitation used from 3 August 2016 to 1 November 2021, in City of Johannesburg. It is not a 2021 ward and is not drawn on today’s map. Official results of the 2016 Local Government Elections below (the latest verified for this place), with their sources.

Boundaries of this earlier delimitation are not in the record.

Its results are below, by election.

Share of valid votes

  1. DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE80,3%
  2. AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS13,2%
  3. ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS4,7%
  4. VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS0,7%
  5. AFRICAN INDEPENDENT CONGRESS0,6%
  6. Others (5)0,5%

All contestants and the source

2016 Local Government Elections

Held · Official results — not current figures

Ward 104 ward ballot

DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE won the ward in 2016, with 9 175 votes (80,3% of valid votes).

This is the latest verified contest in this ward.

Registered voters
17 297
Votes cast
11 500
Turnout
66,5%
Spoilt ballots
78
How many votes did each contestant receive?
Party or contestantVotesShare
DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE9 17580,3%
AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS1 51213,2%
ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS5324,7%
VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS770,7%
AFRICAN INDEPENDENT CONGRESS700,6%
AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY320,3%
AZANIAN PEOPLE'S ORGANISATION110,1%
TRULY ALLIANCE80,1%
AL JAMA-AH40,0%
AFRICAN PEOPLE'S SOCIALIST PARTY10,0%

Elections in this ward

The general election of this ward's delimitation, newest first · IEC results

  1. 2016 Local Government ElectionsDEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE had the most votes, 80,3%.

Public money

Projects whose published coordinates lie in this ward; budgets, audits and tenders are published for the municipality as a whole

No project on the national register publishes a point in this ward. Provincial and municipal project registers are not on the record yet, so this is not a statement that no public project exists here.

Budgets, audit opinions and tenders: City of Johannesburg’s public money. Nothing municipal is divided across wards or attributed to this ward without a source that says so.