2006 Local Government Elections
Held on 1 March 2006. Results by municipal area, summed from the IEC's voting-district results. No boundary geometry is held for this election's areas, so its results are shown as tables.
Municipal PR ballot: results
Every voter's proportional representation ballot for their municipal council.
| Party or contestant (as listed) | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 6 469 420 | 65,7% |
| DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE/DEMOKRATIESE ALLIANSIE | 1 608 154 | 16,3% |
| INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 744 486 | 7,6% |
| INDEPENDENT DEMOCRATS | 217 761 | 2,2% |
| UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT | 129 047 | 1,3% |
| AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY | 128 990 | 1,3% |
| PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA | 109 816 | 1,1% |
| VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS | 94 140 | 1,0% |
| UNITED CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY | 62 459 | 0,6% |
| MINORITY FRONT | 42 530 | 0,4% |
| NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION | 35 899 | 0,4% |
| UNITED INDEPENDENT FRONT | 31 018 | 0,3% |
| Others (81 together) | 178 379 | 1,8% |
Show all 93 parties and contestants
Key figures
- Valid votes
- 9 852 099
- Turnout
- 48,0%
- Votes cast
- 10 085 400
- Spoilt votes
- 233 301
- Registered voters
- 21 019 897
- Ballots
- 237
Compare with another local Government election
No map for this election
KwaZulu-Natal: by municipal area
Municipal areas as the official results list them for this election
| Municipal area | Valid votes | Turnout | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | Most votes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abaqulusi [Vryheid] | 35 131 | 50,2% | 27,5% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 57,2% |
| Dannhauser [Durnacol] | 16 891 | 48,4% | 36,3% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 49,6% |
| eDumbe [Paulpietersburg] | 13 502 | 51,5% | 28,0% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 64,1% |
| Emnambithi/Ladysmith [Ladysmith] | 46 221 | 53,0% | 56,9% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 56,9% |
| eNdondakusuka [Mandeni] | 26 294 | 47,7% | 52,3% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 52,3% |
| Endumeni [Dundee] | 10 654 | 50,9% | 47,4% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 47,4% |
| eThekwini [Durban Metro] | 599 228 | 44,1% | 58,9% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 58,9% |
| Ezinqoleni [Izinqolweni] | 11 480 | 57,2% | 46,7% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 48,1% |
| Greater Kokstad [Kokstad] | 12 691 | 51,5% | 85,3% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 85,3% |
| Hibiscus Coast [Port Shepstone] | 54 257 | 52,4% | 67,4% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 67,4% |
| Hlabisa [Somkele] | 37 947 | 54,9% | 15,8% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 81,1% |
| Imbabazane [Loskop] | 22 580 | 54,1% | 36,4% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 53,9% |
| Impendle [Impendle] | 5 523 | 45,0% | 69,1% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 69,1% |
| Indaka [Waaihoek] | 21 035 | 58,3% | 17,6% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 76,5% |
| Ingwe [Creighton] | 20 752 | 55,5% | 53,2% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 53,2% |
| Jozini [Mkuze] | 36 311 | 57,0% | 24,8% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 73,4% |
| Kwa Sani [Underberg] | 3 591 | 50,6% | 70,2% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 70,2% |
| KwaDukuza [Stanger] | 41 590 | 55,5% | 66,5% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 66,5% |
| Maphumulo [Maphumulo] | 21 360 | 53,3% | 33,2% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 64,6% |
| Mbonambi [KwaMbonambi] | 26 888 | 57,6% | 38,1% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 55,7% |
| Mkhambathini [Camperdown] | 12 181 | 49,9% | 53,2% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 53,2% |
| Mooi Mpofana [Mooirivier] | 6 617 | 48,6% | 60,0% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 60,0% |
| Msinga [Pomeroy] | 37 074 | 58,7% | 12,8% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 82,6% |
| Msunduzi [Pietermaritzburg] | 109 393 | 47,7% | 66,3% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 66,3% |
| Mthonjaneni [Melmoth] | 10 390 | 52,0% | 24,9% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 70,4% |
| Mtubatuba [Mtubatuba] | 7 037 | 41,5% | 37,3% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 49,2% |
| Ndwedwe [Ndwedwe] | 33 581 | 53,7% | 50,0% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 50,0% |
| Newcastle [Newcastle] | 56 812 | 46,0% | 44,9% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 44,9% |
| Nkandla [Nkandla] | 26 317 | 56,9% | 12,4% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 85,2% |
| Nongoma [Nongoma] | 41 949 | 58,8% | 5,4% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 92,9% |
| Nqutu [Nqutu] | 31 742 | 55,7% | 19,0% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 73,8% |
| Ntambana [Ntambana] | 16 020 | 55,5% | 23,6% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 69,8% |
| Okhahlamba [Bergville] | 26 490 | 57,0% | 33,7% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 59,4% |
| Richmond [Richmond] | 12 615 | 51,7% | 73,8% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 73,8% |
| The Big 5 False Bay [Hluhluwe] | 7 484 | 57,1% | 28,4% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 66,9% |
| Ubuhlebezwe [Ixopo] | 21 082 | 53,3% | 68,4% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 68,4% |
| Ulundi [Ulundi] | 43 402 | 58,5% | 4,1% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 93,4% |
| Umdoni [Scottburgh] | 14 601 | 46,1% | 53,3% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 53,3% |
| Umhlabuyalingana [Emangusi] | 29 970 | 58,2% | 45,3% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 53,2% |
| uMhlathuze [Richards Bay] | 55 295 | 46,0% | 47,3% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 47,3% |
| uMlalazi [Eshowe] | 48 612 | 53,7% | 23,9% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 70,8% |
| uMngeni [Howick] | 20 544 | 56,9% | 57,4% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 57,4% |
| uMshwathi [Wartburg] | 20 423 | 51,4% | 64,4% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 64,4% |
| Umtshezi [Estcourt] | 17 259 | 60,4% | 35,5% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 56,3% |
| UMuziwabantu [Harding] | 18 987 | 56,8% | 65,7% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 65,7% |
| Umvoti [Greytown] | 19 595 | 50,9% | 38,2% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 54,3% |
| Umzimkhulu [Umzimkulu] | 39 770 | 57,9% | 92,4% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 92,4% |
| Umzumbe [Umzumbe] | 35 077 | 52,8% | 55,9% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 55,9% |
| UPhongolo [Pongola] | 24 705 | 55,7% | 32,9% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 61,5% |
| Utrecht [Utrecht] | 4 987 | 47,2% | 37,0% | INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 45,9% |
| Vulamehlo [Dududu] | 18 435 | 53,0% | 54,0% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 54,0% |
Coverage and comparability
What this election's record holds, the delimitation its areas sit on, and which elections it may be compared with
By ballot
- Municipal PR ballot
- Ward ballot
Boundaries and comparisons
Areas of the 2006 municipal delimitation; no boundary geometry is held, so areas are listed by name and code and never drawn on another delimitation's map.
Nationally and by province this election compares with every other local Government election. By municipality: no other election is on the same delimitation, so municipal results are listed per election and never side by side. Wards are compared only within one delimitation.
About this record
Coverage, limitations, source issues and how the figures were checked
What the record holds
- Loaded: the proportional representation (PR) ballot of every municipality, as sums of the IEC's voting-district rows for each municipality (the number of voting districts summed is stored with each figure).
- Municipal areas are those of this election, as the IEC file lists them. No boundary geometry is held for them: results are shown as tables, never drawn on today's boundaries.
- Ward ballots: 3895 wards of the 2006 delimitation, each the sum of its voting districts in the IEC's results file. Ward candidates are not named in the file; every independent candidate in a ward is in one line, "INDEPENDENT", as published.
What it does not hold
- Not loaded in this milestone: ward ballots (each ward of this delimitation would need its own place record), the district council (DC 40%) ballots (the file does not name the district a municipality belongs to), and district-management-area ballots. Their voting-district rows are in the official file (SHA-256 recorded). Update, 9 October 2026: the ward ballots have since been loaded from the same file (notes below); the district council and district-management-area ballots are still not loaded.
- These are the 2006 wards. Ward codes were reissued at each delimitation, so a 2006 ward is not the 2021 ward with the same number and is not drawn on today's map.
Source issues
- 6 line(s) have a garbled registered-voters field next to a party name with an unquoted comma; the voting district's figure is taken from its other lines.
How it was read and checked
- Election date: Polling day as proclaimed in the Government Gazette. The IEC results files do not state the date and the proclamation is not yet among this election's captured documents.
Sources
The official files behind these results
| Document | Role | Retrieved | SHA-256 |
|---|---|---|---|
| IEC 2006 Local Government Elections — full results down to voting-district level (zipped CSV) | Results data | 8 October 2026 | 42785a46247f1bad… |
Turnout 48,0%


