Skip to content
Mandate SA — home

1999 National and Provincial Elections

Held on 2 June 1999. Results by municipal area, summed from the IEC's voting-district results. No boundary geometry is held for this election's areas, so its results are shown as tables.

National ballot: results

Elects the National Assembly from national party lists (from 2024, 200 of its 400 seats; before 2024, all 400 seats).

1999 National and Provincial Elections — National ballot
Party or contestant (as listed)VotesShare
AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS10 601 33066,4%
DEMOCRATIC PARTY1 527 3379,6%
INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY1 371 4778,6%
NEW NATIONAL PARTY1 098 2156,9%
UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT546 7903,4%
AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY228 9751,4%
VRYHEIDSFRONT \ FREEDOM FRONT127 2170,8%
UNITED CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY125 2800,8%
PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA113 1250,7%
FEDERAL ALLIANCE86 7040,5%
MINORITY FRONT48 2770,3%
AFRIKANER EENHEIDSBEWEGING46 2920,3%
Others (4 together)56 1230,4%
Show all 16 parties and contestants
All 16 parties and contestants
Party or contestant (as listed)VotesShare
AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS10 601 33066,4%
DEMOCRATIC PARTY1 527 3379,6%
INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY1 371 4778,6%
NEW NATIONAL PARTY1 098 2156,9%
UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT546 7903,4%
AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY228 9751,4%
VRYHEIDSFRONT \ FREEDOM FRONT127 2170,8%
UNITED CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY125 2800,8%
PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA113 1250,7%
FEDERAL ALLIANCE86 7040,5%
MINORITY FRONT48 2770,3%
AFRIKANER EENHEIDSBEWEGING46 2920,3%
AZANIAN PEOPLE'S ORGANISATION27 2570,2%
ABOLITION OF INCOME TAX AND USURY PARTY10 6110,1%
THE GOVERNMENT BY THE PEOPLE GREEN PARTY9 1930,1%
THE SOCIALIST PARTY OF AZANIA9 0620,1%

Key figures

Valid votes
15 977 142
Turnout
89,4%
Votes cast
16 228 462
Spoilt votes
251 320
Registered voters
18 162 063
Ballots
1

Compare with another national & Provincial election

No map for this election

Boundary geometry for the areas of 1999 is not held. Areas change between elections, so these results are never drawn on today's boundaries; they are listed by area below.

Free State: by municipal area

Municipal areas as the official results list them for this election

1999 National and Provincial Elections — National ballot — Free State
Municipal areaValid votesTurnoutANCMost votes
ALLANRIDGE TLC7 71190,7%90,0%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 90,0%
ARLINGTON TLC1 45493,1%87,9%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 87,9%
BETHLEHEM TLC31 37289,8%77,2%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 77,2%
BETHULIE TLC2 77093,7%78,0%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 78,0%
BLOEMFONTEIN RURAL RLC3 31291,7%71,9%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 71,9%
BLOEMFONTEIN TLC173 00492,2%66,3%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 66,3%
BOSHOF TLC2 71593,2%76,9%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 76,9%
BOTHAVILLE TLC18 84592,9%88,5%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 88,5%
BOTSHABELO TLC76 32794,4%93,7%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 93,7%
BRANDFORT TLC5 23793,3%78,9%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 78,9%
BULTFONTEIN TLC8 66390,1%85,8%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 85,8%
CENTRAL SOUTH FS RLC1 67592,0%56,5%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 56,5%
CLARENS TLC1 94790,8%86,4%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 86,4%
CLOCOLAN TLC6 33693,9%87,1%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 87,1%
CORNELIA TLC1 66398,0%93,1%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 93,1%
DEALESVILLE TLC1 89692,9%86,7%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 86,7%
DENEYSVILLE TLC6 39392,2%83,7%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 83,7%
DEWETSDORP TLC3 80093,7%83,6%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 83,6%
DRAKENSBERG RLC14 09193,6%81,8%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 81,8%
EDENBURG TLC2 38490,0%78,0%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 78,0%
EDENVILLE TLC2 63694,2%88,2%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 88,2%
EXCELSIOR TLC2 48193,1%85,3%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 85,3%
FAURESMITH TLC1 52089,5%74,3%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 74,3%
FICKSBURG TLC14 94189,4%87,7%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 87,7%
FRANKFORT TLC10 03393,7%82,9%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 82,9%
GARIEP DAM TLC50591,5%39,4%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 39,4%
HARRISMITH TLC18 41692,5%84,8%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 84,8%
HEILBRON TLC11 15990,7%84,1%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 84,1%
HENNENMAN TLC9 84792,4%80,8%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 80,8%
HERTZOGVILLE TLC2 90897,3%87,9%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 87,9%
HOBHOUSE TLC1 37690,5%84,1%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 84,1%
HOOPSTAD TLC5 10093,4%88,0%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 88,0%
JACOBSDAL TLC2 35285,3%79,5%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 79,5%
JAGERSFONTEIN TLC2 56589,8%84,3%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 84,3%
KESTELL TLC2 94890,6%80,9%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 80,9%
KOEPEL RLC5 45855,7%81,5%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 81,5%
KOFFIEFONTEIN TLC4 44291,2%85,0%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 85,0%
KOPPIES TLC6 50191,9%87,1%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 87,1%
KROONKOP RLC5 52895,5%86,9%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 86,9%
KROONSTAD TLC42 44389,5%79,5%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 79,5%
LADYBRAND TLC8 85085,7%84,0%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 84,0%
LINDLEY TLC4 10286,7%80,1%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 80,1%
LUCKHOF TLC1 03788,9%73,6%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 73,6%
MALUTI RLC12 76992,7%82,6%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 82,6%
MARQUARD TLC5 35994,6%88,2%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 88,2%
MASHAE FOURIE TLC4 72790,2%87,4%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 87,4%
MAUTSENDAL TLC1 33895,6%95,0%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 95,0%
MEMEL TLC2 94392,0%84,6%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 84,6%
MODDERVAAL RLC3 72183,0%68,0%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 68,0%
ODENDAALSRUS TLC27 68489,5%86,0%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 86,0%
OPPERMANSGRONDE TLC41081,5%29,8%UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT 55,6%
ORANJE-WEST RLC2 50284,8%53,8%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 53,8%
ORANJEVILLE TLC1 59293,7%84,2%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 84,2%
PARYS TLC21 53790,1%72,8%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 72,8%
PAUL ROUX TLC2 43487,5%62,4%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 62,4%
PETRUS STEYN TLC5 22294,1%86,7%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 86,7%
PETRUSBURG TLC2 46288,5%81,0%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 81,0%
PHILIPPOLIS TLC1 64088,2%81,4%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 81,4%
PHUTHADITJHABA TLC18 38087,8%90,2%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 90,2%
QWA QWA RLC95 82290,2%93,2%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 93,2%
REDDERSBURG TLC1 99591,1%80,5%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 80,5%
REITZ TLC7 32686,8%73,4%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 73,4%
RIEMLAND RLC7 13092,3%81,8%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 81,8%
ROUXVILLE TLC2 63696,3%88,6%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 88,6%
SANDRIVIER RLC5 86095,8%84,0%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 84,0%
SASOLBURG TLC37 45592,1%69,7%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 69,7%
SENEKAL TLC9 31087,3%83,8%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 83,8%
SMITHFIELD TLC2 02492,4%80,1%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 80,1%
SOUTH EAST FS RLC4 04894,5%67,5%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 67,5%
SOUTPAN TLC1 30995,3%91,4%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 91,4%
SPRINGFONTEIN TLC1 67691,8%75,7%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 75,7%
STEYNSRUS TLC3 08592,4%86,5%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 86,5%
THABA NCHU RURAL RLC5 33987,1%73,9%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 73,9%
THABA NCHU TLC28 89088,4%76,1%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 76,1%
THABA PATCHOA TLC39395,7%56,5%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 56,5%
THEUNISSEN TLC11 46188,0%88,6%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 88,6%
TROMPSBURG TLC1 59992,7%76,3%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 76,3%
TWEELING TLC2 11091,7%80,1%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 80,1%
TWEESPRUIT/KOPANO TLC3 04591,4%85,7%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 85,7%
VAALDAM RLC6 59095,2%78,5%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 78,5%
VANSTADENSRUS TLC62095,1%87,9%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 87,9%
VENTERSBURG TLC4 63088,1%84,6%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 84,6%
VERKEERDEVLEI TLC684103,5%93,9%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 93,9%
VETVAAL RLC10 52393,1%88,1%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 88,1%
VILJOENSKROON TLC14 401104,7%84,1%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 84,1%
VILLIERS TLC6 08892,6%87,2%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 87,2%
VIRGINIA TLC30 38796,2%81,7%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 81,7%
VREDE TLC7 79490,0%85,7%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 85,7%
VREDEFORT TLC5 38891,0%86,5%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 86,5%
WARDEN TLC3 80678,7%81,8%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 81,8%
WELKOM TLC93 21189,1%80,5%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 80,5%
WEPENER TLC3 79688,3%87,5%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 87,5%
WESSELBRON TLC10 01291,7%88,1%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 88,1%
WINBURG TLC5 27587,2%86,8%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 86,8%
ZASTRON TLC5 59586,1%88,3%AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 88,3%

Coverage and comparability

What this election's record holds, the delimitation its areas sit on, and which elections it may be compared with

By ballot

  • National ballot
  • Provincial ballot

Boundaries and comparisons

Areas of the pre-2000 structures (no delimitation on record); no boundary geometry is held, so areas are listed by name and code and never drawn on another delimitation's map.

Nationally and by province this election compares with every other national & Provincial election. By municipality: no other election is on the same delimitation, so municipal results are listed per election and never side by side. Wards are compared only within one delimitation.

About this record

Coverage, limitations, source issues and how the figures were checked

What the record holds

  • No boundary geometry is held for this election's municipal areas: results are shown as tables, never drawn on today's boundaries.

Historical context

  • Before the first democratic local elections of December 2000, local government consisted of transitional councils (TLCs, TRCs and others). The IEC file groups voting districts by these councils; they are kept as listed, as areas of their own period.

Source issues

  • The IEC results portal's "full election results" button for 1999 links to the 1994 document (NPE 1994.pdf). The 1999 file was retrieved from the IEC's own upload folder (1999 NPE.zip, 2.9 MB, matching the size the portal states).
  • The file names provinces as they are known today (e.g. LIMPOPO, then called Northern Province); kept as the IEC lists them.
  • The voting-district file and the IEC's results report (IEC National Elections 1999 — Detailed Results, all provinces (PDF), results as at 17/12/2014 11:14:21 AM) differ in 8 of 200 figures, all in Eastern Cape, Free State, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, Limpopo, North West, Northern Cape. Mpumalanga, Western Cape agree exactly. The figures shown are the voting-district file's, as published; the report most likely reflects later corrections. Not adjusted; to raise with the IEC.
  • The voting-district file and the IEC's results report (IEC Provincial Elections 1999 — Detailed Results, all provinces (PDF), results as at 17/12/2014 01:43:34 PM) differ in 8 of 290 figures, all in Eastern Cape, Free State, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, Limpopo, North West, Northern Cape. Mpumalanga, Western Cape agree exactly. The figures shown are the voting-district file's, as published; the report most likely reflects later corrections. Not adjusted; to raise with the IEC.

How it was read and checked

  • Election date: Polling day as proclaimed in the Government Gazette. The IEC results files do not state the date and the proclamation is not yet among this election's captured documents.
  • Results are stored for each municipal area (and for votes cast abroad) as sums of the IEC's voting-district rows; the number of voting districts summed is stored with each figure. Voting-district detail is in the official file (SHA-256 recorded) but not loaded (storage policy, DATABASE §8.2).

Sources

The official files behind these results

Official documents behind this record
DocumentRoleRetrievedSHA-256
IEC 1999 National and Provincial Elections — full results down to voting-district level (zipped CSV)Results data8 October 2026985ac3bfba844851…
IEC National Elections 1999 — Detailed Results, all provinces (PDF)Results report8 October 20264d3640c46fb6e213…
IEC Provincial Elections 1999 — Detailed Results, all provinces (PDF)Results report8 October 20264592e4e8fa554145…

Turnout 89,4%