Ward 106
A ward of the delimitation used from 1 March 2006 to 18 May 2011, in City of Johannesburg [Johannesburg]. It is not a 2021 ward and is not drawn on today’s map. Official results of the 2006 Local Government Elections below (the latest verified for this place), with their sources.
Boundaries of this earlier delimitation are not in the record.
Share of valid votes
- DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE/DEMOKRATIESE ALLIANSIE78,5%
- AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS18,4%
- INDEPENDENT DEMOCRATS1,2%
- AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY0,9%
- VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS0,5%
- Others (3)0,6%
2006 Local Government Elections
Held · Official results — not current figures
Ward 106 ward ballot
DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE/DEMOKRATIESE ALLIANSIE won the ward in 2006, with 7 123 votes (78,5% of valid votes).
This is the latest verified contest in this ward.
- Registered voters
- 18 474
- Votes cast
- 9 156
- Turnout
- 49,6%
- Spoilt ballots
- 77
| Party or contestant | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE/DEMOKRATIESE ALLIANSIE | 7 123 | 78,5% |
| AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 1 671 | 18,4% |
| INDEPENDENT DEMOCRATS | 111 | 1,2% |
| AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY | 83 | 0,9% |
| VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS | 41 | 0,5% |
| CHRISTIAN FRONT | 21 | 0,2% |
| CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY | 17 | 0,2% |
| AZANIAN PEOPLE'S ORGANISATION | 12 | 0,1% |
Elections in this ward
The general election of this ward's delimitation, newest first · IEC results
- 2006 Local Government ElectionsDEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE/DEMOKRATIESE ALLIANSIE had the most votes, 78,5%.
Public money
Projects whose published coordinates lie in this ward; budgets, audits and tenders are published for the municipality as a whole
No project on the national register publishes a point in this ward. Provincial and municipal project registers are not on the record yet, so this is not a statement that no public project exists here.
Budgets, audit opinions and tenders: City of Johannesburg [Johannesburg]’s public money. Nothing municipal is divided across wards or attributed to this ward without a source that says so.