2016 Local Government Elections
Held on 3 August 2016. Results by municipal area, summed from the IEC's voting-district results. No boundary geometry is held for this election's areas, so its results are shown as tables.
Municipal PR ballot: results
Every voter's proportional representation ballot for their municipal council.
| Party or contestant (as listed) | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | 8 121 466 | 54,5% |
| DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE | 4 028 087 | 27,0% |
| ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS | 1 228 949 | 8,2% |
| INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY | 636 674 | 4,3% |
| AFRICAN INDEPENDENT CONGRESS | 145 818 | 1,0% |
| VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS | 113 124 | 0,8% |
| UNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT | 91 275 | 0,6% |
| CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE | 67 777 | 0,5% |
| AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY | 62 454 | 0,4% |
| AFRICAN PEOPLE'S CONVENTION | 40 750 | 0,3% |
| PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF AZANIA | 29 799 | 0,2% |
| FORUM 4 SERVICE DELIVERY | 28 849 | 0,2% |
| Others (191 together) | 311 566 | 2,1% |
Show all 203 parties and contestants
Key figures
- Valid votes
- 14 906 588
- Turnout
- 57,7%
- Votes cast
- 15 189 423
- Spoilt votes
- 282 835
- Registered voters
- 26 333 353
- Ballots
- 213
Compare with another local Government election
No map for this election
Boundary geometry for the areas of 2016 is not held. Areas change between elections, so these results are never drawn on today's boundaries; they are listed by area below.
Limpopo: by municipal area
Municipal areas as the official results list them for this election
AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESSDEMOCRATIC ALLIANCEECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERSINKATHA FREEDOM PARTYAFRICAN INDEPENDENT CONGRESSVRYHEIDSFRONT PLUSUNITED DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENTCONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE
| Municipal area | Valid votes | Turnout | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS | Most votes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ba-Phalaborwa | 35 587 | 51,3% | 68,6% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 68,6% |
| Bela-Bela | 16 429 | 55,4% | 51,8% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 51,8% |
| Blouberg | 42 277 | 50,8% | 74,1% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 74,1% |
| Elias Motsoaledi | 60 929 | 51,4% | 66,4% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 66,4% |
| Ephraim Mogale | 26 933 | 50,0% | 64,8% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 64,8% |
| Greater Giyani | 68 533 | 55,0% | 82,2% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 82,2% |
| Greater Letaba | 56 677 | 51,7% | 76,0% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 76,0% |
| Greater Tubatse/Fetakgomo | 96 871 | 49,8% | 69,9% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 69,9% |
| Greater Tzaneen | 94 187 | 51,8% | 75,5% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 75,5% |
| Lepele-Nkumpi | 51 101 | 49,3% | 67,1% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 67,1% |
| Lephalale | 28 404 | 49,7% | 64,3% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 64,3% |
| Makhado | 82 350 | 45,8% | 75,1% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 75,1% |
| Makhuduthamaga | 62 604 | 50,0% | 68,2% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 68,2% |
| Maruleng | 29 074 | 56,1% | 56,3% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 56,3% |
| Modimolle/Mookgopong | 28 792 | 57,7% | 47,4% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 47,4% |
| Mogalakwena | 69 093 | 48,9% | 64,2% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 64,2% |
| Molemole | 30 135 | 51,7% | 72,7% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 72,7% |
| Musina | 23 564 | 55,1% | 74,3% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 74,3% |
| New Municipality | 70 492 | 45,2% | 84,4% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 84,4% |
| Polokwane | 161 794 | 51,7% | 57,2% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 57,2% |
| Thabazimbi | 22 485 | 50,8% | 45,1% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 45,1% |
| Thulamela | 102 995 | 45,8% | 79,4% | AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 79,4% |
Coverage and comparability
What this election's record holds, the delimitation its areas sit on, and which elections it may be compared with
By ballot
- Municipal PR ballot
- Ward ballot
Boundaries and comparisons
Areas of the 2016 municipal delimitation; no boundary geometry is held, so areas are listed by name and code and never drawn on another delimitation's map.
Nationally and by province this election compares with every other local Government election. By municipality: no other election is on the same delimitation, so municipal results are listed per election and never side by side. Wards are compared only within one delimitation.
About this record
Coverage, limitations, source issues and how the figures were checked
What the record holds
- Loaded: the proportional representation (PR) ballot of every municipality, as sums of the IEC's voting-district rows for each municipality (the number of voting districts summed is stored with each figure).
- Municipal areas are those of this election, as the IEC file lists them. No boundary geometry is held for them: results are shown as tables, never drawn on today's boundaries.
- Ward ballots: 4392 wards of the 2016 delimitation, each the sum of its voting districts in the IEC's results file. Ward candidates are not named in the file; every independent candidate in a ward is in one line, "INDEPENDENT", as published.
What it does not hold
- Not loaded in this milestone: ward ballots (each ward of this delimitation would need its own place record), the district council (DC 40%) ballots (the file does not name the district a municipality belongs to), and district-management-area ballots. Their voting-district rows are in the official file (SHA-256 recorded). Update, 9 October 2026: the ward ballots have since been loaded from the same file (notes below); the district council and district-management-area ballots are still not loaded.
- These are the 2016 wards. Ward codes were reissued at each delimitation, so a 2016 ward is not the 2021 ward with the same number and is not drawn on today's map.
How it was read and checked
- Election date: Polling day as proclaimed in the Government Gazette. The IEC results files do not state the date and the proclamation is not yet among this election's captured documents.
- Reconciled with the IEC's results report (IEC Local Government Election 2016 — Results Summary, All Ballots, all provinces (PDF), results as at 2016/08/11 16:49:53): all 206 figures compared (each party's votes per province and in total; valid, spoilt and cast votes and registered voters) agree exactly.
- Reconciled with the IEC's national results summary: ward-ballot valid votes agree exactly (14 957 083 in the file; votes cast less spoilt in the summary: 14 957 083); independent candidates agree.
Sources
The official files behind these results
| Document | Role | Retrieved | SHA-256 |
|---|---|---|---|
| IEC 2016 Municipal Elections — complete voting-district-level results data (zipped CSV) | Results data | 8 October 2026 | 9ec0c4054e8e2653… |
| IEC Local Government Election 2016 — Results Summary, All Ballots, all provinces (PDF) | Results report | 8 October 2026 | 657128d876e77187… |
Turnout 57,7%